So @Everyone, then I have a question about the work of the 2nd and 3rd prize winners.
1.The main part of the work of the 2nd and 3rd prize winners was created on a 3D printer, and how it was created is not shown. Perhaps the figures were simply made to order. Artificial intelligence is now used to create layouts for 3D printers.
2. The work must be done specifically for the competition, but if we look at last year's second-place winner's work, we can see the same gazebo, only in a different size. It seems that the same layout was used for the 3D printer.
As a result, 2nd and 3rd place were essentially taken by a 3D printer. Is this fair to the participants who did everything from start to finish with their own hands?
333 Views
I’ve already made a post addressing your false accusations and explained everything there. It’s quite strange that you only target the 2nd and 3rd place winners, while completely ignoring the 1st. Please take a moment to read what I wrote before making further claims. I hope this amount of evidence is enough for you to stop bullying me in the future. Feel free to attack me again if you want, because I created my work myself, and believe me, I can defend it, because I documented every step of my process, unlike others. I’m fine with being disqualified if necessary, they can review my work again, ask for additional documentation, and check everything thoroughly. If, after that, it still doesn’t meet the requirements, then they can exclude me. However, if they refuse to provide any information about how the first-place work was verified or how they checked the originality of the entries, then I’m seriously considering withdrawing my entry.